agebion.blogg.se

Martin logan motion fx 2
Martin logan motion fx 2








martin logan motion fx 2

Now, my original thought was to stick with the proven Focal range(for my taste).,perhaps Focal Aria. Does make me happy though -), although you'd take such feedback with a grain of salt. F208 is a step-up from F206 and costs $5K retail, while I bought the Focal 826s for, I think around $2K+ several years back on a sale(retail was ~3.5K) and is more comparable to the F206s, in price range. esp, this commentary contrasting Focal Chorus 826v ( which are in my HT as mains). So on the Revels, this Revel F208 Audiogon feedback not very comforting. ( I'll forgive you for the Phils -).,jk, am sure they sound great) So you guys saying, my top picks are the top picks of yours too -). Īny experience/thoughts on these two Revels (vs ML 60XTs ?) F206 may be comparable to the 60XTs, but they havent gone down in price while the 60Xts can be had <2K. Most of the reviews pit the F36 against GoldenEar Triton Five, MartinLogan Motion 40, Monitor Audio 300 etc.obviously in this range. I did demo against ML motion 40 and definitely liked the 60 better.for some reason the 60 was more towards my liking(less brighter, more neutral.

MARTIN LOGAN MOTION FX 2 FULL

I'm sure they'd have a dominating presence in my office room but does have spousal approval! I could run these full range with no sub.,the bass reproduction is that impressive, but obviously dont go that low, which may not be that critical for the type of music I listen to.īut before pulling the trigger on them for close to $2K, I was looking at the Revel Concerto2 F36 & Revel Performa3 F206( couple of others in this range). Sound similar to my Focal 826 towers which are in my HT.there's something to be said of well integrated towers than bookshelf/sub combos for 2 channel music. So I've been auditioning the ML Motion 60XT the last few days and really really impressed with them.far more dynamic, indulging, outstanding clarity and bass performance.,compared to the ML's bookshelves. At the same time, I've been passively looking to replace my stereo DefTechs in the family room ( not bad, but not in the same league as my Focals & MLs), so could move the 35XTs there. I dont listen usually to music with heavy bass or at loud volumes(<75db mostly). While it sounds great in the high/mid range, lacking a bit in the lower end. Some of you may know I have presently the ML 35XTi in my office room for 2 channel music and I've been happy with those mostly.,barring the Sub issue with Sonos Amp(which is now replaced with my Marantz SR7010 for now).










Martin logan motion fx 2